The figure you read is the one that counts on resale
Because when you sell, it is the acquisition costs you will have to recoup, plus those of the sale. Tracking that leaves them out is setting up a disappointment.
Almost every dashboard compares the current value with the price paid, and forgets the fees. On an older property, fees often represent nearly a tenth of the price: ignoring them turns a zero capital gain into an apparent profit.

A home bought on the resale market carries transfer duties and notary fees that commonly represent seven to eight per cent of the price, to which may be added agency fees and the cost of the works carried out. So a property sold after four years at five per cent above its purchase price has gained nothing: it has lost money. It is arithmetic, and yet the vast majority of portfolio trackers show the flattering comparison, because it is the only one they have — the purchase price is a known figure, the total cost requires entering three more lines. Those three lines are exactly what separates a portfolio tracker from a decorative table.
Price paid, notary fees, agency fees. These are three amounts that appear on documents you own, and they cannot be guessed: a flat rate applied to the price would give an invented total cost.
Every project recorded — with its quotes, its invoices, its before and after photos — adds to the total cost. It is also what makes a resale file credible: the spending is dated and backed up.
The difference is expressed in euros and as a percentage, and it is often less spectacular than the difference from the purchase price. That is the price of an honest calculation.
Every dated estimate stays on record. So you read a curve rather than a point, which lets you tell a market movement from the effect of works.
Because when you sell, it is the acquisition costs you will have to recoup, plus those of the sale. Tracking that leaves them out is setting up a disappointment.
Once recorded, they raise the cost base and serve twice: in the change in value, and in the resale file where they show the property has been maintained.
Two homes bought at different times, with different costs, cannot be compared on purchase price. Total cost puts them on the same basis.
art. 150 VB of the French General Tax Code
Maintenance and repair expenses can NOT be added to the cost base: only construction, reconstruction, extension or improvement works can, and not if they have already been deducted from rental income. An owner who deducted their works each year cannot count them a second time on resale.
art. 150 U and art. 150 VC of the French General Tax Codedisputed point
The allowances for length of ownership do not follow the same pace for income tax and for social charges: a property can be exempt from income tax and still be subject to social charges for several more years.
Finance Law No. 2025-127 of 14 February 2025 for 2025
It is a major change of regime for furnished landlords taxed on actual figures: the annual benefit of depreciation comes back, in part, on exit. Portfolio tracking that ignores this effect overstates the net result of a resale. We do not calculate its tax consequence — see the refusal below.
Even if it is more flattering, and even if it is what most dashboards do. A gain calculated without acquisition costs is not a performance, it is an arithmetical optical illusion.
It depends on the exact nature of the works, on what has already been deducted from income, on how long the property has been held, on the letting regime and now on the depreciation claimed. It is a calculation to be done with the documents in hand, with a professional.
art. 150 VB and art. 150 VC of the French General Tax Code
A rate applied to the price would produce a plausible and wrong total cost. The actual amounts appear on your deed and your invoices; we prefer an empty field to an invented figure.
Included from the Essentiel tier.
Because it is calculated against the total cost — purchase price plus notary fees, agency fees and works — and not against the price paid alone. On an older property, the fees often represent nearly a tenth of the price: ignoring them turns a zero capital gain into an apparent profit.
In the total cost tracked by Pilot, yes, as soon as they are recorded. Note: for the tax calculation of the capital gain, only certain works can be added to the cost base, and not if they have already been deducted from rental income. They are two different calculations.
No. It depends on the nature of the works, on what has already been deducted, on how long you have held the property, on the letting regime and now on the depreciation claimed on furnished lettings taxed on actual figures. It is a calculation to be done with the documents in hand.
Because it would give a plausible and wrong total cost, on which the yield and the verdict on which property to keep would then rest. The actual amounts are on your deed; we prefer an empty field.
Anchored to the sales actually signed nearby, with the date of the estimate and its confidence level.
Costs deducted, total cost in the denominator. One single definition of yield across the whole product.
Generated from your repayment schedule, so it ages on its own. The net value follows from it, estimated selling costs deducted.
Ranked on net yield, IRR, and a keep / sell / watch verdict — suspended when the value is not certain enough.
Content reviewed on 2026-08-06.
At launch: a 7-day trial on your real properties, card required.