You do not send a letter with no effect
The most common case: a notification of increase on a home whose energy rating forbids it. The landlord believes for months that they have acted, and finds out at the first disagreement.
Almost every tool gives you a market rent. None tells you whether you have the right to ask for it — on this tenancy, this year, with this energy rating. Yet it is the only one of the two answers you can act on without risk.
It is the most expensive misunderstanding in amateur property management. An owner discovers that their home would let for a hundred euros more, notifies an increase, and considers the matter settled. Yet an increase is only possible in specific cases: at the annual review if the tenancy agreement provides for it and it is not time-barred, on re-letting within the limits of rent control, or at renewal on condition of demonstrating manifest undervaluation with comparable references. Outside these cases, the letter has no effect: the rent payable remains the old one, and any overpayment must be refunded. Pilot therefore always keeps the two figures apart, and shows next to the second the rule that limits it.
Type of tenancy agreement, effective date, review clause and its reference quarter, anniversary date. These elements decide the applicable regime before any figure comes into play.
The energy performance certificate (EPC) rating first: for the lowest ratings, an increase is prohibited whatever the mechanism — review, renewal, re-letting. An absolute prohibition is read before any calculation, otherwise you calculate for nothing.
The annual review has its conditions and its limitation period. Re-letting opens a different window, bounded by rent control where it exists. Renewal requires showing undervaluation with comparable references. Three routes, three answers, never merged into a single figure.
Allowed, and by how much; not yet due, and on what date; frozen, and by which text; time-barred, and since when. A refusal without grounds is a breakdown; a refusal with grounds is information you can act on — by renovating, or by waiting for the right date.
The information remains useful: it is what tells you whether the property deserves works, or whether you should prepare a re-letting. It is simply presented for what it is — an observation, not a right.
The most common case: a notification of increase on a home whose energy rating forbids it. The landlord believes for months that they have acted, and finds out at the first disagreement.
A time bar cannot be lifted; an energy rating can, by renovating. A reasoned refusal turns a constraint into an investment decision.
The re-letting window is often the only real opportunity to reposition a rent. Seeing it coming six months ahead changes the way you handle a tenant’s departure.
art. 17-1 I of Law No. 89-462 of 6 July 1989
Without a review clause in the tenancy agreement, there is no annual review at all — and many older agreements have none. A missing clause cannot be added during the tenancy by a simple letter.
art. 18 of Law No. 89-462; annual decree capping re-letting rentsdisputed point
Re-letting is therefore not a reset. Believing that a change of tenant lets you set the rent freely is the most widespread mistake in high-pressure areas, and it is paid for with a refund.
art. 17-2 of Law No. 89-462
The proposal must be notified six months before the end of the term, with the supporting references. A proposal without references, or with too few, is irregular — and the increase falls away entirely, not partially.
art. 159 of Law No. 2021-1104 of 22 August 2021
It is a prohibition that overrides all three routes at once. A landlord who reasons “I cannot review, so I will wait for re-letting” is wrong: re-letting is closed too.
These are two answers to two different questions, and presenting them as one figure produces a recommendation that is economically logical and legally impossible. Both are displayed, side by side, separately.
An upward renewal requires references to neighbouring rents, in a minimum number set by law and presented in a precise form. We state the condition and what it requires; we do not manufacture the references.
art. 17-2 of the Law of 6 July 1989
Even when the gap to the market is considerable. Displaying an unreachable potential is not information, it is an invitation to make the mistake.
Included from the Essentiel tier.
The market rent tells you what the property would be worth if it were vacant. The permitted rent tells you what you can ask on THIS tenancy, this year, with this energy rating. The two can differ by several hundred euros, and only the second can be acted on without risk.
Not in the areas where re-letting rents are capped: the new rent cannot in principle exceed that of the previous tenant, except for improvement works or manifest undervaluation. Believing that a change of tenant resets the counter is the most widespread mistake.
Then there is no annual review, and one cannot be added by letter during the tenancy. Pilot flags it rather than calculating an index that does not apply.
None of the three: the increase is prohibited at review, at renewal and on re-letting. The only route is renovation, and that is precisely the useful information — it turns a constraint into an investment decision.
No. The law requires references to neighbouring rents, in a minimum number and in a specific form, notified six months before the end of the term. We state the condition; we do not manufacture the references, because an insufficient file brings down the whole increase.
Index fetched from INSEE — IRL, or ILC, ILAT and ICC for a commercial lease — with the reference quarter taken from the LEASE. Pilot refuses to index when the law forbids it.
Eight municipalities and inter-municipal authorities, at district × period × rooms × furnished granularity. Where there is ambiguity, Pilot refuses to conclude rather than pick a cap at random.
Cross-referenced across several sources, with its range and its sample. When the sources contradict each other, Pilot says so rather than deciding.
Rent below market, charges rising over twelve months, yield below the rest of the portfolio, EPC soon banned from letting, loan above market.
Content reviewed on 2026-08-06.
At launch: a 7-day trial on your real properties, card required.