You no longer lose a year by forgetting
The regulatory calendar shows the anniversary date AND the limitation date of the same tenancy. The review stops being something you remember and becomes something you see coming.
Indexing a rent comes down to a multiplication. Knowing whether you are entitled to it this year, on this tenancy, with this index, comes down to four rules that almost nobody puts together. Pilot reads them all before proposing a figure — and stays silent, citing its text, when one of them stands in the way.
The review is not retroactive and it becomes time-barred. A landlord who notices in the spring has lost the previous year’s increase, for good — and will lose it again the following year, because nothing in their binder will remind them of the date. Conversely, a landlord who indexes a home rated F or G notifies a void increase: they think they have acted, they have written a letter with no effect, and they will find out at the first dispute, when they are told that the rent due never moved. The two mistakes mirror each other and cost the same: a year’s rent.
Unfurnished, furnished, student, house-share: IRL regime. Bail mobilité and seasonal: no periodic review; the very notion makes no sense for a non-renewable, fixed-rent contract. Commercial and professional: other indices, other mechanics. This reading comes before any calculation — it decides whether a calculation is even allowed.
A home with an EPC rating of F or G can no longer have its rent reviewed. Pilot stops here, before even looking at the index: an absolute freeze is not up for discussion in light of the market, and suggesting a figure would mean suggesting a letter with no effect.
The review must be requested within a year of its effective date. Pilot calculates the date the right lapses and displays it BEFORE, not after. A time bar flagged after the event is no longer information, it is a record of loss.
Through the public data feed, for the reference quarter written into the tenancy agreement — not the current quarter. The reference quarter is set by the agreement and never moves: only the year moves forward. A fallback table covers corrected values, so that a past calculation does not change its result after an index revision.
New rent excluding charges, monthly difference, annual difference, effective date. The notification letter is pre-filled with these values and the legal basis cited, and the payment schedule updates on the effective date — not immediately.
The regulatory calendar shows the anniversary date AND the limitation date of the same tenancy. The review stops being something you remember and becomes something you see coming.
It is the most discreet mistake in the subject: recalculating the quarter from the review date rather than from the tenancy agreement shifts the base from one year to the next. The gap is small in the first year and impossible to recover by the fifth, because it compounds.
When Pilot says no, it says on what grounds. You know whether the block can be lifted — a time bar cannot, an energy rating can, by renovating — instead of reading it as a malfunction.
Rebuilt from the payment schedule, not re-entered. A wrong amount in the notification is grounds for dispute handed to the tenant.
art. 17-1, I of Law No. 89-462 of 6 July 1989
The period runs from the effective date set in the tenancy agreement, not from the date you think of it. A retroactive adjustment over several years does not exist: each year not requested is permanently the tenant’s gain.
art. 159 of Law No. 2021-1104 of 22 August 2021 (Climat et résilience), in force since 24 August 2022
The freeze is absolute and does not depend on any clause of the tenancy agreement: a tenancy on an EPC-rated G home with no review date remains frozen. Notifying an increase anyway does not make it due — the rent payable remains the old one, and any overpayment is refundable.
art. 17-1, I para. 1 of Law No. 89-462
Deriving the quarter from the review date rather than from the tenancy agreement changes the calculation base from one year to the next. The gap is small in the first year and then compounds: after five years, the rent no longer matches any identifiable rule.
art. L. 145-38 of the French Commercial Code
A landlord who notifies an IRL review on a commercial lease believes they have acted and has done nothing enforceable. Nor does the one-year time bar of art. 17-1 concern them: so they believe they are under pressure from a deadline that does not apply to them.
It applies the lease’s index — ILC, ILAT, or ICC for an older clause — with the three-year rule of the commercial lease. When a sliding-scale clause moves the rent by more than a quarter, it flags it without deciding: that is for the commercial rent judge.
art. L. 145-38 and L. 145-39 of the Commercial Code
Even when the market rent would amply justify it. The “What you can apply today” page explicitly separates the two questions, because confusing them produces a recommendation that is economically logical and legally impossible.
Foreign indices cannot be derived from the IRL. The engine names the expected index and refuses: a refusal that says what to go and find is better than a transposed figure.
Included from the Essentiel tier.
It is lost for that year: Article 17-1 does not allow it to be recovered retroactively. Pilot tells you the next effective date and the date on which that new right will lapse in turn.
No. The freeze under article 159 of the loi Climat et résilience covers the annual review, renewal and re-letting. Pilot flags it with the EPC rating that triggers it, and refuses to suggest an amount.
No. Pilot generates the pre-filled letter and files it in the tenancy file; sending it remains your responsibility. Automatic sending by registered post does not exist with us yet, and we would rather write that than let you discover it.
From INSEE’s public data feed, for the reference quarter written into the tenancy agreement. A fallback table covers corrected quarters, so that a past calculation does not change its result after an index revision.
Pilot indexes it on your lease’s index — ILC or ILAT, and the ICC if it appears in an older clause — fetched from INSEE. The three-year review under article L. 145-38 of the Commercial Code is calculated; a gap of more than a quarter caused by a sliding-scale clause is flagged, not decided. A professional lease follows only the indexation clause of its contract.
Whether a review is available or not, the date of the next one, the constraints detected with their legal grounds, and what becomes possible on re-letting. It is the distinction missing everywhere else.
Eight municipalities and inter-municipal authorities, at district × period × rooms × furnished granularity. Where there is ambiguity, Pilot refuses to conclude rather than pick a cap at random.
Notices to quit, formal notice, repayment plan, reconciliation, deposit refund, works, insurance, guarantor, managing agent; guarantee deed, certificates, SCI general meetings. Amounts rebuilt instalment by instalment.
EPC, surveys, insurance, end of tenancy, tax deadlines, over a rolling twelve months.
Content reviewed on 2026-10-07.
At launch: a 7-day trial on your real properties, card required.