Tenancy agreements and documents

Electronic signature: written, tested, and not yet switched on.

A real signature has already been carried through to the end on our side, by both parties, with the PDF retrieved and archived. Yet it is not open, and this page explains why — because a signature you cannot rely on is worth less than no signature at all.

Coming soon

The integration is written, tested, and a real signature has been carried through to the end by both parties. But our provider access is the sandbox one, and every document produced carries the statement “test environment — no legal value”, right down to the signatory’s e-mail. We will not switch it on until a document signed with us is worth what it is worth elsewhere.

A “signed” tenancy agreement that proves nothing costs you the case you thought you had won.

The day a tenant challenges the amount of the rent, the term of the tenancy or the existence of a clause, it is not your software that will answer: it is your document. An electronic document has the same force as a paper one only under two cumulative conditions — that the person it comes from can be identified, and that it is drawn up and kept in conditions that guarantee its integrity. A process that meets both conditions produces a document you can rely on against the other party. A process that half meets them produces a feeling of security, and a feeling cannot be pleaded. So we preferred to let you sign on paper for a few more months rather than sell you a tick box.

  • The process we have chosen is in place and has already signed a real tenancy agreement
  • It runs on a test key: every document produced says so, in plain words
  • We will not open it until a deed signed with us is worth what it is worth elsewhere
  • What is missing is not code — it is an environment switch and credits

In practice.

  1. The tenancy agreement is generated first, not uploaded

    The signature does not apply to a file you drafted elsewhere: it applies to the tenancy agreement Pilot has pre-filled from the property, tenancy and tenant data. That is what makes it possible to know which fields are signed, by whom, and where in the document.

  2. Each signatory is identified separately

    A joint-liability house-share tenancy agreement has not one signatory but as many as there are tenants, each with their position. A process that makes do with a single signatory produces an agreement where two co-tenants out of three have signed nothing — and nobody notices before the first unpaid rent.

  3. The procedure is tracked, followed up, or cancelled

    A request sent is not a request signed. The status of each process is tracked, a reminder can be resent, and a process can be cancelled then resumed without starting again from the blank document.

  4. The signed document comes back into the tenancy’s data room

    Not in a mailbox, not in the provider’s dashboard: in the tenancy file, next to the inventory report and the rent receipts. The evidence certificate is archived with it.

  5. A safety net catches what the channel does not report

    A notification channel can go silent without any signal announcing it — we have been through it, with a provider interface that declared itself healthy and sent nothing. So a periodic reconciliation asks again for the status of ongoing processes, rather than waiting to be told.

What it changes

What is blocking is written down, not hidden behind “coming soon”

You know exactly what is missing: a production key and credits with the provider. Not a rebuild, not a partnership to negotiate. It is information that lets you decide whether to wait or not.

The day it opens, nothing changes for you

The documents that can be signed are already defined, the signatory roles already modelled, the archiving already connected. The switch-over is a change of key, not a new feature to learn.

The documents that should not be signed this way are already excluded

The guarantee deed and the notice to quit are not on the list of documents that can be signed, and that is not an oversight: having them signed electronically would be counterproductive, or even void. See the “The law” block below.

The law, and the pitfalls

An electronic document has the same evidential value as a paper document only if its author can be identified and its integrity is guaranteed, from its creation to its storage.

art. 1366 of the French Civil Code

It is this condition, and not the presence of a signature image, that decides. A PDF with a finger-drawn scribble pasted onto it meets the form and not the condition: it is not worth a signed document, and you find that out at the most expensive moment — in front of the judge.

An electronic signature must consist of the use of a reliable identification process guaranteeing its link with the document. Reliability is only PRESUMED for a qualified electronic signature.

art. 1367 para. 2 of the French Civil Code; Decree No. 2017-1416 of 28 September 2017

Without a qualified signature, the presumption does not apply: if challenged, it is up to the party relying on the document — the landlord — to prove the reliability of the process. A simple or advanced signature remains perfectly valid, but the burden of proof changes sides, and that is exactly what you do not want to learn on the day of the dispute.

A guarantor who is a natural person must precede their signature with a statement written out in their own hand, on pain of nullity of the guarantee.

art. 2297 of the French Civil Code (Ordinance No. 2021-1192 of 15 September 2021)disputed point

A statement pre-printed in a template, even ticked and signed electronically, is not a statement written by the guarantor. The guarantee is then void — and it is void at the very moment it was supposed to be used, that is, when the tenant stops paying. That is why the guarantee deed cannot be signed with us.

A notice to quit served on the tenant draws its validity from its SERVICE — registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt, judicial officer’s writ, or delivery by hand against signature.

art. 15 I of Law No. 89-462 of 6 July 1989

Having a notice to quit “signed” electronically replaces none of these three methods: the notice period does not start running, and the landlord believes they have acted when they have delivered nothing. Note too that the date of receipt, not the date of posting, starts the period running — a nuance that costs a month.

What Pilot refuses to do

  • We will not have a guarantee deed signed

    The statement must be written by the guarantor personally. An electronic journey that pre-fills it produces a void guarantee, that is, a guarantee that evaporates at the moment it is needed. We supply the template to be completed by hand.

    art. 2297 of the French Civil Code

  • We will not have a notice to quit signed

    Its validity depends on how it is served, not on a signature. Offering a “get the notice to quit signed” button would give the landlord the certainty of having acted, and the notice period would not start running.

    art. 15 I of the Law of 6 July 1989

  • We do not call a finger-drawn trace an “electronic signature”

    The inventory report is signed on the spot, with a finger, and we describe it for what it is: joint, timestamped and sealed. It is not an electronic signature within the meaning of the French Civil Code, and using that word would cast doubt on everything else we say.

Availability

Included from the Pro tier.

  • 7-day trial at launch, card required
  • No commitment

Frequently asked questions

Can I sign a tenancy agreement with Pilot today?

No. The feature exists, it has signed a real tenancy agreement from start to finish, but it runs on a test key: every document produced carries the statement “test environment — no legal value”, and that statement also goes into the signatory’s email. Generate the tenancy agreement with Pilot and have it signed on paper or with your own tool in the meantime.

What exactly is missing?

A production key with the provider, credits purchased, and an environment switch. There is no development left, and that is precisely why we prefer to write it rather than announce a date.

Is a simple electronic signature enough for a residential tenancy agreement?

Nothing in the law of 6 July 1989 requires a qualified signature for a residential tenancy agreement. But without a qualified signature, the presumption of reliability under article 1367 does not apply: in the event of a dispute, it is up to the landlord to prove the process was reliable. It is a choice of risk level, and it is yours — hence our insistence on naming it.

Why not have the guarantee signed too, while we are at it?

Because article 2297 of the Civil Code requires an individual guarantor to write out personally the statement that precedes their signature, failing which the guarantee is void. A pre-filled statement, even signed, does not meet that condition. We provide the template to fill in by hand.

And the inventory report — is it signed electronically?

No, and we do not call it that. It is signed on the spot, with a finger, by both parties: the document is jointly established, time-stamped and sealed. It is solid as proof of an agreement recorded together; it is not an electronic signature within the meaning of the Civil Code.

Right next to it.

Tenancy agreements and documents

Thirty letters, pre-filled from the file.

Notices to quit, formal notice, repayment plan, reconciliation, deposit refund, works, insurance, guarantor, managing agent; guarantee deed, certificates, SCI general meetings. Amounts rebuilt instalment by instalment.

Tenancy agreements and documents

Your documents, and the dates that make them expire.

Everything filed, searchable, exportable. Each document can carry an expiry date that feeds the alerts, and the tenant finds their tenancy agreement and diagnostics in their own space.

Content reviewed on 2026-08-06.

Get started

Add your first property.

At launch: a 7-day trial on your real properties, card required.